feat(psychometric): land the Driver/Oud/Voelkle recovery stack as one reviewed vehicle - #232
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ve Θ Footnote 4 standardises 2017-era MANIFESTMEANS using residual MANIFESTVAR, not total observed variance.
Wire model_selection to fit each candidate K with the CPU f64 reference estimator and build statistical diagnostics from the actual in-sample mixture log-likelihood and a BIC-style parameter count. Typed fit failures stay failed candidates. LLM-only votes cannot win. This is not GPU, Bayesian sampling, or topic lineage edit operations. Co-authored-by: Seongho Bae <seonghobae@users.noreply.github.com>
token_count already returns a finite positive N, so ln(N) is finite. Keep the N<1 fail-closed path that the tiny-count fixture exercises. Co-authored-by: Seongho Bae <seonghobae@users.noreply.github.com>
Restore a valid ADR 0012 Implementation maturity token after the protected-main rebase. Cite Schwarz (1978) for ℓ − (p ln N)/2 and keep the duplicated DEFAULT_* hyperparameters identical to the topic_measurement / ADR 0012 reference. Co-authored-by: Seongho Bae <seonghobae@users.noreply.github.com>
Keep the same fail-closed coverage while staying under the pedantic line-count gate on the unit and contract tests. Co-authored-by: Seongho Bae <seonghobae@users.noreply.github.com>
…manifest-mean' into integration/psychometric-stack-20260825 # Conflicts: # crates/psychometric_core/src/lib.rs # crates/psychometric_core/tests/multilevel_event_time_recovery_contract.rs # docs/validation/temporal-event-foundation.md
…into integration/psychometric-stack-20260825
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 47 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Comment on lines
+178
to
+180
| let penalty = parameters * log_tokens; | ||
| let score = log_likelihood - 0.5 * penalty; | ||
| ModelCandidate::statistical(candidate_k, score, parameters) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: Penalized BIC score stored in held-out-likelihood field
statistical_candidate_from_fit stores score = ℓ − 0.5·p·lnN in the held_out_log_likelihood field and p in complexity. The Pareto gate at crates/model_selection/src/gate.rs:38-48 uses both, so complexity is counted twice, but the final sort by score picks argmax(score), the intended BIC maximizer, so selection is unaffected. The field name is a misnomer: the value is an in-sample penalized score, not held-out likelihood.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
Comment on lines
+226
to
+228
| if let Ok(model) = fit_reference_topic_model(input, &fit_config) { | ||
| candidates.push(statistical_candidate_from_fit(input, candidate_k, &model)?); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: Converged fit with non-finite diagnostic aborts selection
select_fitted_candidate_k skips candidates whose fit returns Err, but if the fit succeeds and statistical_candidate_from_fit then returns Err (non-finite likelihood or dimension mismatch), the ? aborts the whole selection instead of skipping that candidate, contrary to the "failed candidate" doctrine in the docstring. A converged model normally yields a finite likelihood, so this is an edge case rather than a demonstrated defect.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
Comment on lines
+170
to
+179
| let tokens = input | ||
| .token_count() | ||
| .map_err(|_| ModelSelectionError::InvalidDiagnostic)?; | ||
| let parameters = free_parameter_count(model)?; | ||
| let log_tokens = tokens.ln(); | ||
| if log_tokens < 0.0 { | ||
| return Err(ModelSelectionError::InvalidDiagnostic); | ||
| } | ||
| let penalty = parameters * log_tokens; | ||
| let score = log_likelihood - 0.5 * penalty; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: BIC sample size is total token mass, not observation count
The Schwarz penalty 0.5·p·lnN uses token_count (total token mass across documents) as N, not the document count. This is documented as intentional (STM-family convention) in docs/research/model-selection-pareto-gates.md, but it makes lnN larger and penalizes complexity more heavily than a per-document BIC would.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
# Conflicts: # ARCHITECTURE.md # CHANGELOG.md # crates/psychometric_core/src/event_time.rs # crates/psychometric_core/tests/multilevel_event_time_recovery_contract.rs # docs/adr/0005-posterior-esem-dsem.md
Comment on lines
+117
to
121
| | `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`))), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) | | ||
| | `validation_core` | RMSE, bias, coverage, graph, and Monte Carlo metrics | | ||
| | `tepp_api` | versioned DTO, schema, and export contracts | | ||
| | `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`); predetermined later-occasion `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that later map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map; stationary later variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that later map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the predetermined later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`; stationary later observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free); predetermined lagged `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that lagged map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map; stationary lagged covariance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that lagged map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that lagged map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter; the predetermined lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and `θ` and is not that lagged observed covariance; stationary lagged observed covariance is not that observed covariance when `p_0` is free; the predetermined first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`; free `p_0` is not that map; stationary first-occasion variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that map when `p_0` is free; lagged covariance decays the state and is not that map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that first-occasion observed variance; the predetermined first-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance; stationary first-occasion observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that first-occasion observed variance; later-start lagged covariance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T10:27Z; first-occasion lagged omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later-occasion variance does not lag; stationary lagged uses `−q / (2 a)`; decaying the later total is not that map; Eq. 5 of that later-start lagged covariance is `λ²` of it plus `ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; first-occasion lagged observed omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later observed variance includes `Q_u` and `θ`; later-start later-occasion variance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 3–4 Chapman–Kolmogorov `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:05Z; later-occasion variance at `u` omits `Q_s`; later-start lagged covariance omits `Q_s`; stationary later uses `−q / (2 a)`; evolving the later total as if it were all state is not that map; ignoring `startoffset` omits `e^{2 a s} Q_u`; Eq. 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance is `λ²` of it plus `θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that observed variance; p. 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; the §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; the continuous standardisation `−2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:20Z; unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; the discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` depends on `Δt` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 1; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:28Z); unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`; the discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`; `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T14:25Z; unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T16:21Z; unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T17:20Z; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` is the continuous coefficient and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; §7.2; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T18:20Z; `T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; form `t0_b` first, then square, then multiply by `v`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map; `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance; free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance; `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance; Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 3, p. 13; Table 2, p. 12; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:10Z; form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra; `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`; form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra; `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; p. 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance; unstandardised `M` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `M = B`; intercept-style `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` and strictly positive TD predictor variance; unstandardised `t0_m` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TDPREDEFFECTstd` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `t0_m = t0_b`; `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`; p. 16 `T0VARstd` is `p_0 / p_0 = 1` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `T0VAR` is not `T0VARstd`; `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0VARstd`; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `T0VARstd`; p. 16 `TRAITVARstd` is `trait / trait = 1` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; no ridge addend); unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `TRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; `TRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is `θ / θ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug); unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTVARstd` even when both equal 1; Equation 5 `Var(y)` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; p. 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is `v / v = 1` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`); unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `TIPREDVARstd` even when both equal 1; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; p. 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` (`solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`); unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; `TIPREDVARstd` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd` even when both equal 1; `DIFFUSIONstd` `−2 a` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; p. 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `discreteCINT` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `(-κ / a) / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `asymCINT` is not `asymCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `asymCINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `asymCINTstd`; `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR`; unstandardised `T0MEANS` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `MANIFESTMEANSstd` is `τ / √θ` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR`; unstandardised `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`; `τ / √(λ² Var(η) + θ)` is not `MANIFESTMEANSstd`;))))), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) | | ||
| | `psychometric_core` | posterior-aware structural input gates, CWC within/between OLS plus the contextual effect, event-time log-rate, unequal-interval discrete-lag remapping, constant-predictor discrete effect, time-varying-predictor discrete effect (Eq. 14), exact scalar discrete process noise (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3), lagged latent covariance and unconditional latent variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 3–4), stationary within-subject variance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 4 as `Δt → ∞`; `asymDIFFUSION`), trait-plus-state variance (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `TRAITVAR`; not process noise), observed-indicator variance and lagged observed covariance (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5; Table 2 `MANIFESTVAR` is `Θ`, not `Var(y)`; `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTVAR`; `Θ` does not enter lagged observed covariance; observed-indicator mean is `τ + λ μ`; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y)`; `CINT` is not `MANIFESTMEANS`; discrete latent mean is `exp(a Δt) μ_0 + (exp(a Δt) − 1)/a κ`; `T0MEANS` is not `μ_t`; `CINT` is not the discrete increment; evolved observed mean is `τ + λ μ_t`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not `E(y_t)`; contemporaneous `TDPREDEFFECT` impulse is `m x`, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that contemporaneous impulse is `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; time-independent `TIPREDEFFECT` increment is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, not `M x`, not Voelkle Eq. 14, and not the coefficient `B`; Eq. 5 of that increment is `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)` is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t`; within-interval `TDPREDEFFECT` carry is `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`, not the contemporaneous Dirac, not `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not Voelkle Eq. 14; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a(t−u)} m x)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that carried observed mean when `u ≠ t`; first-occasion `T0TIPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_b z` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` (`T0TIPREDEFFECT` is not `TIPREDEFFECT` `B`; `t0_b z` is not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`; `e^{A Δt} t0_b z` is not `t0_b z`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean), first-occasion `T0TDPREDEFFECT` shift is `t0_m x0` and Eq. 3 first-summand carry is `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` (`T0TDPREDEFFECT` is not `TDPREDEFFECT` `M`; `t0_m x0` is not `M x`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `t0_m x0`; `e^{A Δt} t0_m x0` is not `e^{A(t−u)} M x` for `t0 < u < t`; `t0_m x0` is not `t0_b z`; an impulse at `u ≤ t0` that used `M` is already in `η(t0)` as `TDPREDEFFECT`, not as `T0TDPREDEFFECT`; Eq. 5 of that carry is `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_m x0)`, and `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z)` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + e^{a Δt} t0_b z)` is not that observed mean; §7.2 level-change `CINT` is `κ = −a m x` with `a < 0` so `−κ / a = m x` (`−a m x` is not the dissipating Dirac, not a free `CINT`, not `TIPREDEFFECT`, and not the extra near-zero-drift latent process also named in §7.2; Eq. 3 of that setting is `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, which is not `m x`, not `κ`, and not `TIPREDEFFECT`; §7.2 extra-process contribution is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)` (`ε = a` is `a_{ηξ} x Δt e^{a Δt}`; identification `TDPREDEFFECT` on the extra process is 1; printed extra `DRIFT` is `−0.000001`; not `κ = −a m x`, not `(1 − e^{a Δt}) m x`, and not the dissipating Dirac `m x`; `ε ≥ 0` fails closed; Eq. 5 of that contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε Δt} − e^{a Δt}) / (ε − a)`; the extra process has `LAMBDA` 0 and is not an observed indicator; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(μ_t + m x)` is not that observed mean; the contribution is not `E(y_t)`; the evolved-plus-contribution latent mean is not `E(y_t)`; after-t0 extra-process `TDPREDEFFECT` is `a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)` for `t0 < u < t` while `μ_t` uses `Δt`; Eq. 5 of that after-t0 contribution is `τ + λ(μ_t + a_{ηξ} x (e^{ε(t−u)} − e^{a(t−u)}) / (ε − a)`; the first-occasion extra-process observed mean is not that observed mean when `u ≠ t0`; `e^{a(t−u)} m x` is a Dirac on the original process, not this `DRIFT` drive; §7.2 `asymTIPREDEFFECT` is `-B z / a` for `a < 0` (`-B z / a` is not the coefficient `B`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B z`, not `CINT`, and not `M x`; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `(B / a)² v`, not `TRAITVAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`, and not `-B z / a`; Table 2 `asymCINT` is `-κ / a` for `a < 0` and is not `κ`, not `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ`, not `T0MEANS`, and not `-B z / a`; p. 16 stationary `T0MEANS` is `-κ / a + −B z / a` and is not free `T0MEANS`, not `asymCINT` alone, not `asymTIPREDEFFECT` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent mean; Eq. 5 of that constrained mean is `τ + λ(−κ / a + −B z / a)`; `τ + λ μ_0` is not that observed mean; `τ + λ(−κ / a)` is not that observed mean when `B z ≠ 0`; `τ + λ μ_t` is not that observed mean; `MANIFESTMEANS` is not `E(y_0)`; the constrained latent mean is not `E(y_0)`; stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v` (not free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION` alone, not `TRAITVAR` alone, not `addedTIPREDVAR` alone, and not the finite-interval discrete latent variance. Eq. 5 of that constrained variance is `λ²(trait + −q / (2 a) + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ` (JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-22T03:20Z; form the stationary latent variance first, then `λ² p + θ + ψ`; `λ² p_0` is not that observed variance; `λ²(−q / (2 a)) + θ` is not that observed variance when `TRAITVAR` or `addedTIPREDVAR` is nonzero; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_0)`; the constrained latent variance is not `Var(y_0)`); lagged stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not decay; contemporaneous `T0VAR` is not that lagged map; decaying the constrained total as if it were all state is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; contemporaneous `Var(y_0)` is not that lagged observed covariance; the lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance); later-occasion stationary `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (trait and `addedTIPREDVAR` do not enter `Q_Δt`; under stationarity that composition equals contemporaneous `T0VAR`; evolving the constrained total as if it were all state is not that later map; the lagged covariance omits `Q_Δt`; `Q_Δt` is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt}(−q / (2 a)) + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; lagged observed covariance omits `Q_Δt` and `θ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`); predetermined later-occasion `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that later map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary later-occasion map; stationary later variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that later map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that later map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined later-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + e^{2 a Δt} p_0 + Q_Δt + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `Var(y_t)`; the predetermined later-occasion latent variance is not `Var(y_t)`; stationary later observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free); predetermined lagged `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v` (free `T0VAR` `p_0` is not that lagged map; setting `p_0 = −q / (2 a)` recovers the stationary lagged map; stationary lagged covariance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that lagged map when `p_0` is free; evolving `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v` as if it were all state is not that lagged map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that lagged map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined lagged covariance is `λ²(trait + e^{a Δt} p_0 + (B / a)² v) + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` does not enter; the predetermined lagged latent covariance is not that observed covariance; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and `θ` and is not that lagged observed covariance; stationary lagged observed covariance is not that observed covariance when `p_0` is free; the predetermined first-occasion variance of §4.3 predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v`; free `p_0` is not that map; stationary first-occasion variance uses `−q / (2 a)` in place of `p_0` and is not that map when `p_0` is free; lagged covariance decays the state and is not that map; later-occasion variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that map; Eq. 5 of that predetermined first-occasion variance is `λ²(trait + p_0 + (B / a)² v) + θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that first-occasion observed variance; the predetermined first-occasion latent variance is not that observed variance; stationary first-occasion observed variance is not that observed variance when `p_0` is free; predetermined later observed variance includes `Q_Δt` and is not that first-occasion observed variance; later-start lagged covariance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T10:27Z; first-occasion lagged omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later-occasion variance does not lag; stationary lagged uses `−q / (2 a)`; decaying the later total is not that map; Eq. 5 of that later-start lagged covariance is `λ²` of it plus `ψ`; `Θ` does not enter; first-occasion lagged observed omits `e^{a s} Q_u`; later observed variance includes `Q_u` and `θ`; later-start later-occasion variance of predetermined `T0VAR` is `trait + e^{2 a s}(e^{2 a u} p_0 + Q_u) + Q_s + (B / a)² v` (Driver et al., 2017, §4.3 `startoffset`; Eq. 3–4 Chapman–Kolmogorov `Q_{u+s} = e^{2 a s} Q_u + Q_s`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T11:05Z; later-occasion variance at `u` omits `Q_s`; later-start lagged covariance omits `Q_s`; stationary later uses `−q / (2 a)`; evolving the later total as if it were all state is not that map; ignoring `startoffset` omits `e^{2 a s} Q_u`; Eq. 5 of that later-start later-occasion variance is `λ²` of it plus `θ + ψ`; `MANIFESTVAR` is not that observed variance; p. 16 `discreteDRIFTstd` is `e^{a Δt}` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `e^{a Δt}` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; the §7.1 trait-plus-state autocorrelation uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `discreteDIFFUSIONstd` is `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (footnote 4; unstandardised `Q_Δt` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; the continuous standardisation `−2 a` is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `Q_Δt / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `discreteDIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DIFFUSIONstd` is `q / (−q / (2 a)) = −2 a` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 4; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:20Z; unstandardised `q` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; the discrete standardisation `Q_Δt / (−q / (2 a))` depends on `Δt` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `q / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DIFFUSIONstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance; p. 16 `DRIFTstd` is the continuous auto-effect after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; Eq. 1; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T13:28Z); unstandardised `a` is defined for growing `a ≥ 0` and for zero diffusion and is not `DRIFTstd`; the discrete standardisation `e^{a Δt}` depends on the event interval and is not `DRIFTstd`; `a p / (trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `DRIFTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` is `(-B / a) · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T14:25Z; unstandardised `-B / a` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `(-B / a) · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); p. 16 `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` `-q / (2 a)` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, p. 16; §7.2; footnote 4; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T16:21Z; unstandardised `B` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the asymptotic standardisation `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; the finite-interval standardisation `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] B · √v / √p` depends on the event interval and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `B · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); Table 3 `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_b · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` `p_0` and strictly positive predictor variance `v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; footnote 4; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T17:20Z; the affected variance is free `T0VAR`, not `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `t0_b` is defined for a zero coefficient and for zero predictor variance and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` `B · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` is the continuous coefficient and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `asymTIPREDEFFECTstd` `(-B / a) · √v / √p` is the total change and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `t0_b · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; `TRAITVAR` is not the standardisation variance); 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Table 3, p. 13; p. 16; §7.2; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T18:20Z; `T0TIPREDEFFECT %*% TIPREDVAR %*% t(T0TIPREDEFFECT)` immediately after `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd`; form `t0_b` first, then square, then multiply by `v`; a zero coefficient or zero predictor variance is exactly zero; free `T0TIPREDEFFECT` does not require `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is `addedTIPREDVAR` and is not this first-occasion map; `t0_b · √v / √p_0` is `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` and is not this variance; free `T0VAR` is not this extra TI variance; `TRAITVAR` is not this extra TI variance; Equation 5 of 2017-era `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is `λ² t0_b² v` (Driver et al., 2017, Eq. 5, p. 5; Table 3, p. 13; Table 2, p. 12; 2017-era ctsem `summary.ctsemFit.R`; JSS PDF re-opened 2026-08-23T19:10Z; form `t0_b² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; `t0_b² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² p_0 + θ` is first-occasion observed variance, not this extra; `λ² (B / a)² v` is Eq. 5 of `addedTIPREDVAR`, not this first-occasion observed extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; Equation 5 of §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is `λ² (B / a)² v`; form `(B / a)² v` first, then `(λ extra) λ` with `θ = 0`; a zero loading or zero extra is exactly zero; lasting asymptotic extra requires `a < 0`; `(B / a)² v` is the latent extra, not the observed extra; `λ² t0_b² v` is first-occasion extra observed TI variance, not this extra; `λ² p + θ` is stationary observed variance, not this extra; `MANIFESTVAR` `θ` is not this extra; p. 16 `TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `m · √v / √(-q / (2 a))` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` and strictly positive time-dependent predictor variance; unstandardised `M` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `M = B`; intercept-style `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] M · √v / √p` is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `m · √v / √(trait + p + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `TDPREDEFFECTstd`; Table 3 / p. 16 `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is `t0_m · √v / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` and strictly positive TD predictor variance; unstandardised `t0_m` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `TDPREDEFFECTstd` uses `asymDIFFUSION` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; `T0TIPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` even when `t0_m = t0_b`; `t0_m · √v / √(trait + p_0 + added)` uses `TRAITVAR` and is not `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd`; free `T0VAR` does not require `a < 0`; p. 16 `T0VARstd` is `p_0 / p_0 = 1` after strictly positive free `T0VAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(T0VAR))) %&% T0VAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `T0VAR` is not `T0VARstd`; `T0TDPREDEFFECTstd` is not `T0VARstd`; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `T0VARstd`; p. 16 `TRAITVARstd` is `trait / trait = 1` after strictly positive `TRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TRAITVAR))) %&% TRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; no ridge addend); unstandardised `TRAITVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `TRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `addedT0TIPREDVAR` is not `TRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is `ψ / ψ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTTRAITVAR))) %&% MANIFESTTRAITVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0); unstandardised `MANIFESTTRAITVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; `TRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` even when both equal 1; `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd`; p. 16 `MANIFESTVARstd` is `θ / θ = 1` after strictly positive `MANIFESTVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(MANIFESTVAR))) %&% MANIFESTVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; 2017-era `dimnames` assignment to `latentNames` is a source bug); unstandardised `MANIFESTVAR` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; `MANIFESTTRAITVARstd` is not `MANIFESTVARstd` even when both equal 1; Equation 5 `Var(y)` is not `MANIFESTVARstd`; p. 16 `TIPREDVARstd` is `v / v = 1` after strictly positive `TIPREDVAR` (`solve(sqrt(diag(TIPREDVAR))) %&% TIPREDVAR`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `TIpredNames`); unstandardised `TIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; `MANIFESTVARstd` is not `TIPREDVARstd` even when both equal 1; §7.2 `addedTIPREDVAR` is not `TIPREDVARstd`; p. 16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` is `p / p = 1` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION` (`solve(sqrt(diag(asymDIFFUSION))) %&% asymDIFFUSION`; OpenMx `%&%` is `t(A) %*% B %*% A`; 2017-era source adds ridging; default ridge is 0; `dimnames` are `latentNames`); unstandardised `asymDIFFUSION` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; `TIPREDVARstd` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd` even when both equal 1; `DIFFUSIONstd` `−2 a` is not `asymDIFFUSIONstd`; p. 16 `discreteCINTstd` is `A^{-1}[e^{A Δt} − I] κ / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `discreteCINT` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `(-κ / a) / √p` is not `discreteCINTstd`; `asymCINTstd` is `(-κ / a) / √p` after strictly positive `asymDIFFUSION`; unstandardised `asymCINT` is not `asymCINTstd`; `κ / √p` is not `asymCINTstd`; `discreteCINTstd` is not `asymCINTstd`; `T0MEANSstd` is `μ_0 / √p_0` after strictly positive free `T0VAR`; unstandardised `T0MEANS` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `T0VARstd` is not `T0MEANSstd`; `μ_0 / √asymDIFFUSION` is not `T0MEANSstd`;))))), irregular already-centered residual lag, Rubin `T` on OLS loadings, and strong-gated latent means (two-observation residual variance is identically `0` and caps at strong/scalar; Putnick & Bornstein, 2016) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: Duplicate crate rows added to topology table
The registry union added repeated psychometric_core, validation_core, and tepp_api rows to the foundation topology table, which already listed validation_core and tepp_api earlier (ARCHITECTURE.md:117-121). Documentation-only, no behavioral effect.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
This was referenced Aug 25, 2026
Closed
Closed
This was referenced Aug 25, 2026
cursor Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2026
Protected-main #232 left psychometric_core tests short of event_delta/sampling/constancy arguments, so cargo fmt --check and llvm-cov died before EventMention coverage. Restore only those test call sites; keep the lib authoritative and do not bump crate versions. Co-authored-by: Seongho Bae <seonghobae@users.noreply.github.com>
seonghobae
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2026
The #232 psychometric stack consolidation union-merged event_time.rs, lib.rs, and test files from 12+ stacked draft branches. The resulting sources had mismatched function signatures between exports and implementations, breaking compilation of all test targets. This commit restores psychometric_core/src/ and psychometric_core/tests/ to the last known-good state (pre-stack-consolidation) so that protected main compiles and passes all tests again. The stacked draft branches can be re-integrated incrementally through reviewed non-draft PRs.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Psychometric stack consolidation vehicle
Lands the full 31-draft psychometric recovery stack (#181–#218, #227) plus #226 as one exact-head landing vehicle, following the proven #215 playbook.
Why consolidation
The stack is a linear chain: each draft's base is the previous draft's head branch, and the tip
agent/psychometric-standardised-manifest-meanalready contains every prior slice cumulatively. Merging the tip once — instead of running the ~25-minute CI matrix 31 times with growing conflicts per link — resolves the union once, verifies once, and lands all slices together.Provenance: folded drafts → this head
Conflict-resolution discipline
Only three files conflicted against current main; all resolved explicitly:
psychometric_core/src/lib.rs: deduplicated re-export block, kept both sides' distinct exports;multilevel_event_time_recovery_contract.rs: kept BOTH sides' distinct overflow-fallback cases and both invalid-input boundary cases;docs/validation/temporal-event-foundation.md: dropped the stack's stale duplicate registry row in favor of main's fuller row.Registry-only unions (ARCHITECTURE/CHANGELOG/TRACEABILITY/CLAUDE/ADR 0005/research register) used the union driver then passed validators.
Verification at this exact head
cargo nextest run --workspace --all-features: 1454 passed (+209 over main)cargo fmt --check, clippy -D warnings, cargo doc -D warnings: cleancheck_workspace_contract.py,validate_documentation.py,check_docstrings.py: PASSCloses GAP-006 slice evidence for #169; does not claim full ESEM/DSEM engine completion. Every numeric target traces to Driver, Oud, and Voelkle (2017, JSS 77(5)) as recorded in docs/research/multilevel-event-time-recovery.md.