Skip to content

cairo-dock: update to 3.6.2 - #61905

Merged
Duncaen merged 1 commit into
void-linux:masterfrom
r0man1an:cairo-dock
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

cairo-dock: update to 3.6.2#61905
Duncaen merged 1 commit into
void-linux:masterfrom
r0man1an:cairo-dock

Conversation

@r0man1an

@r0man1an r0man1an commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES

Local build testing

  • I built this PR locally for my native architecture, x86_64-glibc
  • I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds):
    • aarch64-glibc
    • x86_64-musl
    • armv7l

Comment thread srcpkgs/cairo-dock/template Outdated
homepage="http://glx-dock.org/"
distfiles="https://github.com/Cairo-Dock/cairo-dock-core/releases/download/${version}/cairo-dock-${version}.tar.gz"
checksum=dcadbbe089487f22b112f25a91d1c966275b245f248f950c6987de787eb95137
distfiles="https://github.com/Cairo-Dock/cairo-dock-core/archive/refs/tags/${version}.tar.gz>${pkgname}-${version}.tar.gz"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renaming the archive shouldn't be required.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes it is pretty redundant. I tested it agin with the original distfile link and it works. I don't know why it failed in my initial testing but whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed the distfile pattern to match upstream and dropped the rename

@Duncaen
Duncaen merged commit 027c4b4 into void-linux:master Aug 10, 2026
8 checks passed
@r0man1an
r0man1an deleted the cairo-dock branch August 11, 2026 00:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants