docs: restructure Layered Zero Trust documentation - #720
Conversation
Rewrite the ZTVP documentation with a customer-first, value-driven approach. GUI installation becomes the primary path, technical deep dives move to dedicated tabs, and new use case pages make the pattern accessible to non-engineering audiences. New pages: - Architecture: layered model, sidecar pattern, deployment variants - Data Protection: qtodo ZT walkthrough for demos and field engineers - Security Monitoring: ACS as the Zero Trust brain with custom policies Updated pages: - About (landing): value proposition, problem statement, capability grid - Getting Started: GUI-first with screenshots and video, CLI as advanced - Existing pages: updated weights and cross-references Assets: 9 GUI installation screenshots + 1 installation video Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Roguski <proguski@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
Hi @p-rog. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a validatedpatterns member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Tip We noticed you've done this a few times! Consider joining the org to skip this step and gain Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sabre1041 @mlorenzofr Please review this update. I tried to cover everything we discussed. |
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
sabre1041
left a comment
sabre1041
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A few requested changes. The images were not liking properly
| @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ | |||
| title: Layered Zero Trust | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We probably should continue to align on the baseline VP structure for the overview. The rest of the pages we should have the ability to customize as we want
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We probably should continue to align on the baseline VP structure for the overview. The rest of the pages we should have the ability to customize as we want
I adjusted the layout to make it more aligned with the baseline VP structure with keeping the current content to not lose the story we want to say here.
| |=== | ||
|
|
||
| [id="try-it-yourself"] | ||
| == Try it yourself |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this section overlap with the content of the Secure Multitiered Applications page?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now when I read the Secure multitiered applications page indeed there is a big overlapping. Maybe we should archive "Secure multitiered applications" in favor of Data Protection page?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the content that is in the "Secure multitiered applications". Lets indeed combine the pages
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This section needs to be updated to utilize Vault
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that maybe we should archive this page in favor of Data Protection one. I will add only hints about the credentials location and Data Protection page will have full story.
… baseline structure Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
@sabre1041 I've addressed all your suggestions. The only thing we have to decide is the "Secure Multitiered Applications" page. IMHO right now the "Secure Multitiered Applications" page is not needed. Everything is already covered in the "Data Protection" page. Are you OK to remove that page? |
Yup lets go ahead and combine the contents of the two pages into a single "Data Protection" page |
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
OK, done:
|
3 participants
Summary
New site structure
Key changes
keycloak-usersSecret removed, credentials now in Vault onlycharts/acs-policies)Test plan
Made with Cursor