Skip to content

Revert "feat(bolt-vite-react-ts): modernize toolchain and remove eslint (#120)" - #123

Merged
xKevIsDev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-120-modernize-vite-react-ts
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

Revert "feat(bolt-vite-react-ts): modernize toolchain and remove eslint (#120)"#123
xKevIsDev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-120-modernize-vite-react-ts

Conversation

@xKevIsDev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reverts #120 (commit 9e5405c).

bolt-vite-react-ts goes back to its pre-#120 state: Vite 5, React 18 types, Tailwind 3 with tailwind.config.js and postcss.config.js, ESLint restored, and src/vite-env.d.ts back.

Conflict resolution

package.json and package-lock.json conflicted because #121 landed afterwards and tightened the @types/react / @types/react-dom ranges from ^19.2.18 to ~19.2.18 — versions that #120 itself introduced. Those lines disappear entirely in the revert, so both files were resolved to their pre-#120 state. The resulting tree is byte-identical to be9cf85 for every path #120 touched.

Notes

Test plan

  • bolt-vite-react-ts tests pass (build produces index.css / index.js, dev server preview updates on edit)
  • package-lock check passes

Made with Cursor

…nt (#120)"

This reverts commit 9e5405c.

The package.json and package-lock.json conflicts came from #121, which only
adjusted the @types/react ranges that #120 introduced, so both files go back
to their pre-#120 state.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@linear-code

linear-code Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@xKevIsDev
xKevIsDev merged commit 1c88308 into main Aug 7, 2026
3 checks passed
@xKevIsDev
xKevIsDev deleted the revert-120-modernize-vite-react-ts branch August 7, 2026 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant