Skip to content

[update_containers] check custom images - #4099

Open
karelyatin wants to merge 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
karelyatin:dnm_custom_images
Open

[update_containers] check custom images#4099
karelyatin wants to merge 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
karelyatin:dnm_custom_images

Conversation

@karelyatin

@karelyatin karelyatin commented Aug 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This allows testing images from different sources

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign eshulman2 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] Check eventless neutron deployment
4aa1943 
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
@karelyatin karelyatin mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Open
@centosinfra-prod-github-app

centosinfra-prod-github-app Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/d8fbc996734540b1ba9b64529830b6a4

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 33m 29s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 33m 44s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 41m 44s
❌ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-minor-update FAILURE in 2h 18m 54s
✔️ cifmw-pod-zuul-files SUCCESS in 5m 24s
✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider-bootc SUCCESS in 1h 13m 54s
❌ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-bootc FAILURE in 40m 47s
❌ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider RETRY_LIMIT in 32m 36s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 11m 29s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 11m 15s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-edpm_prepare SUCCESS in 5m 17s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-update_containers SUCCESS in 6m 21s

karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] Check eventless neutron deployment
01c8f78 
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] Check eventless neutron deployment
ba3a0ea 
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] Check eventless neutron deployment
8a9f2de 
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] Check eventless neutron deployment
02c7fe3 
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] Check eventless neutron deployment
e5b5d72 
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] Check eventless neutron deployment
f70e4af 
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
@karelyatin karelyatin mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2026
Open
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2026
@karelyatin
[DNM] S2I images except neutron-server check
543d4c0 
Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4099
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
amoralej
amoralej reviewed Aug 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@amoralej amoralej left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@karelyatin
[multiple] Allow overriding custom images
970e515 
This allows testing images from different sources.

Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
@amoralej amoralej mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2026
Merged
@centosinfra-prod-github-app

centosinfra-prod-github-app Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/3c11734ba0384c28821764287ef808e1

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 54m 31s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 49m 49s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 54m 38s
❌ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-minor-update FAILURE in 1h 45m 15s
✔️ cifmw-pod-zuul-files SUCCESS in 4m 37s
❌ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider-bootc TIMED_OUT in 47m 48s
⚠️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-bootc SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider-bootc
✔️ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider SUCCESS in 3h 33m 57s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 8m 37s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 9m 00s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-edpm_prepare SUCCESS in 7m 51s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-update_containers SUCCESS in 7m 23s

@karelyatin

karelyatin commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

recheck unrelated failure some race provisioner server checks

@centosinfra-prod-github-app

centosinfra-prod-github-app Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/9ac8d1646db647f5b52f2472e958e730

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 17m 19s
❌ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc NODE_FAILURE Node(set) request 099-0000176686 failed in 0s
❌ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal FAILURE in 1h 01m 14s
❌ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-minor-update NODE_FAILURE Node(set) request 099-0000176688 failed in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-zuul-files SUCCESS in 5m 55s
✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider-bootc SUCCESS in 2h 38m 03s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-bootc SUCCESS in 1h 56m 10s
❌ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider NODE_FAILURE Node(set) request 099-0000176689 failed in 0s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 9m 32s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 8m 19s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-edpm_prepare SUCCESS in 5m 23s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-update_containers SUCCESS in 5m 07s

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@amoralej amoralej amoralej left review comments

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@karelyatin @amoralej