Add RAPx tool documentation - #631
Open
DiuDiu777 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds RAPx documentation to the verify-rust-std mdBook and links it from the Tools chapter/navigation, as a follow-up to PR #491.
Changes:
- Adds a new RAPx tool page (
doc/src/tools/rapx.md) describing installation and usage. - Adds RAPx to the “Approved tools” table (
doc/src/tools.md) with a CI badge link. - Adds RAPx to the book sidebar (
doc/src/SUMMARY.md).
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| doc/src/tools/rapx.md | New RAPx tool documentation page (installation/usage + std-lib verification notes). |
| doc/src/tools.md | Adds RAPx to the approved-tools table and links to a rapx.yml workflow badge. |
| doc/src/SUMMARY.md | Adds RAPx to the Tools navigation list. |
Suppressed comments (2)
doc/src/tools/rapx.md:30
- This section refers to
.github/workflows/rapx.ymlfor pinned toolchain/RAPx versions, but there is norapx.ymlworkflow file in the repository. This makes the instructions non-actionable and the reference a dead link.
The RAPx workflow in this repository pins both the Rust nightly toolchain and
the RAPx revision used by CI. See `.github/workflows/rapx.yml` for the exact
versions.
doc/src/tools/rapx.md:107
- This claims there is a "current CI job" verifying slice for challenge 17, but there is no RAPx workflow in the repository. Reword to describe how to run it locally (and how a CI job would be configured) without asserting it already exists.
The current CI job verifies the slice module for challenge 17. From the root of
a local `verify-rust-std` checkout, set up the environment in the same way as
the workflow:
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
feliperodri
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2026
feliperodri
left a comment
feliperodri
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can ignore Copilot comments, but let's wait #491 gets merge first before merging this one. cc. @tautschnig
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a follow-up to #491.
It adds the RAPx tool documentation to the
verify-rust-stdbook.