Skip to content

OSC-SM: Notified RMA Implementation with Set notify and Bounds - #28

Closed
joe-explr wants to merge 24 commits into
devreal:mainfrom
joe-explr:notified-rma-sm
Closed

OSC-SM: Notified RMA Implementation with Set notify and Bounds#28
joe-explr wants to merge 24 commits into
devreal:mainfrom
joe-explr:notified-rma-sm

Conversation

@joe-explr

@joe-explr joe-explr commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

devreal and others added 23 commits August 2, 2026 14:02
Signed-off-by: Joseph Schuchart <joseph.schuchart@stonybrook.edu>
This commit adds notification support to the OSC SM component by
implementing the put_with_notify, get_with_notify, rput_with_notify,
and rget_with_notify functions. These functions perform the same
operations as their non-notify counterparts but also increment
notification counters after the data transfer completes.

The changes include:
- Added function pointer types for notify variants in osc.h
- Added function prototypes in osc_sm.h
- Implemented the notify functions in osc_sm_comm.c
- Updated the module template to register the new functions
- Removed TODO comments that have been addressed

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
	put_with_notify
	get_with_notify

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
            put_with_notify
            get_with_notify

    Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
…for a single and multi rank window.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
 Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
MPI-5.1 names the error class for an invalid notification index
MPI_ERR_RMA_NOTIFICATION.  Rename the placeholder used by the notified
RMA work to match the standard.

The class was never registered with the error code subsystem, so
MPI_Error_string() and MPI_Error_class() did not know about it; add the
missing CONSTRUCT_ERRCODE()/OBJ_DESTRUCT() pair in errcode.c.

Also fix the binding generator's ERROR_CLASSES list, where the entry was
inserted without a trailing comma and so was silently concatenated with
the following 'MPI_ERR_TYPE' element rather than added as a class of its
own.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Add the two remaining notification-management procedures from MPI-5.1
section 12.6.1:

  MPI_WIN_SET_NUM_NOTIFY is a blocking, synchronizing collective that
  sets the number of notification counters attached at the calling MPI
  process to exactly num_notifications and resets all of them to zero.

  MPI_WIN_GET_NUM_NOTIFY is local and returns the number of counters
  attached at target_rank.

Both are wired through the osc framework as new module entry points, so
components that do not implement them return
MPI_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION rather than crashing.

The osc/sm implementation carves a fixed per-rank counter region out of
the shared segment at window creation, which is therefore the effective
MPI_WIN_NOTIFICATION_NUM_UB; a request beyond that capacity is rejected
with MPI_ERR_ARG.  Each rank publishes its own attached count into the
shared segment, so the collective needs only a barrier -- no counts have
to be exchanged -- and MPI_WIN_GET_NUM_NOTIFY is a plain shared-memory
read.

Also add the missing put_notify/get_notify entries to
interface_profile_sources, which were omitted when those two procedures
were introduced.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Three correctness problems in the osc/sm notified communication path:

1. The notification counters were plain uint64_t but are incremented
   concurrently by remote origins with opal_atomic_add() and polled by
   the local rank.  Type them opal_atomic_int64_t so that the reads in
   MPI_WIN_GET_NOTIFY_VALUE are atomic and cannot be hoisted out of a
   caller's polling loop.

2. The notification index was validated *after* the data movement, so an
   erroneous call had already overwritten the target window (or, for
   get, the origin buffer) by the time the error was returned.  MPI-5.1
   section 12.6.1 makes referencing an out-of-range counter erroneous at
   initiation, so hoist the check above ompi_datatype_sndrcv() in all
   four notified operations.  The check is factored into a helper, which
   also fixes MPI_GET_NOTIFY returning OMPI_ERR_BAD_PARAM instead of
   MPI_ERR_RMA_NOTIFICATION.

3. The get paths used opal_atomic_rmb() before incrementing the target's
   counter.  The notification tells the target that the get has read the
   window, so the constraint is load-before-store, which a load-load
   fence does not express; opal_atomic_add() is relaxed and adds no
   ordering of its own.  Use a full opal_atomic_mb().  In
   MPI_WIN_GET_NOTIFY_VALUE the barrier was likewise placed before the
   counter load, where it ordered nothing; move it after so that it
   gives the acquire semantics the caller needs.

MPI_WIN_RESET_NOTIFY_VALUE also gains the trailing barrier for the same
reason.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Adds the six remaining notified operations from the MPI-5.1 draft --
accumulate, get_accumulate, and the four request-based forms -- so that
osc/sm covers all eight defined in section 12.3, and sizes the
notification counters from window info rather than a compile-time
constant.

The counter region was a fixed 16 entries per MPI process carved out of
the shared segment, and MPI_WIN_SET_NUM_NOTIFY rejected anything larger.
That conflicts with the mpi_assert_max_num_notify info key, whose
default of 0 the standard defines as "the implementation does not assume
any limit on the number of notification counters".  The reservation now
comes from that key when one is given, and otherwise from a new
osc_sm_num_notify_counters MCA parameter.  A request beyond the
reservation relocates the counters to a dedicated shared segment instead
of failing; when the key was given it is a hard bound, since the window
was sized on the strength of that assertion.

Growth is collective and runs inside MPI_WIN_SET_NUM_NOTIFY, which the
standard already defines as a blocking synchronizing collective.  Every
process agrees on the new layout through an allgather of the requested
counts, and on whether the attach succeeded through an allreduce, so a
failure at one process cannot leave others incrementing counters that
nobody reads.  The published count stays clamped to the current
allocation until the larger one exists, so a failed growth cannot leave
behind a count that would admit writes past the end of the region.  A
barrier separates the attach from the unlink, because attach opens the
backing file by name and the broadcast does not tell rank 0 that the
other processes are finished with it.

Each process now caches a per-target pointer to the counters, making the
lookup on the path of every notified operation a single indexed load --
cheaper than the previous base-plus-offset arithmetic -- so the ability
to relocate the region costs the hot path nothing.

Also corrects the reset at the end of component_select(), which zeroed
the whole node state and so wiped the notification fields it had just
written, and removes a stray double semicolon in
ompi_osc_sm_fetch_and_op().

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
MPI-5.1 section 12.2.6, Table 12.1 caches three attributes on every
window: MPI_WIN_NOTIFICATION_NUM_SB, the number of notification counters
the implementation supports efficiently; MPI_WIN_NOTIFICATION_NUM_UB,
the upper bound on that number; and MPI_WIN_NOTIFICATION_VALUE_UB, the
upper bound on a counter value.  Without them a program has no portable
way to ask how many counters it may request, since
MPI_WIN_GET_NUM_NOTIFY reports how many are attached rather than how
many are available.

The values come from a new osc_win_get_notify_bounds entry point on the
osc module, queried once per window while it is configured.  A component
that does not implement notified communication leaves the entry point
NULL and all three attributes read zero, which is the honest answer for
such a window and is consistent with its notified operations returning
MPI_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION.

For osc/sm the bounds follow the reservation: with an
mpi_assert_max_num_notify assertion both NUM_SB and NUM_UB are that
value, since the window was sized for exactly it; without one, NUM_SB is
what was reserved and nothing bounds NUM_UB short of the notification
index type, because the counters grow on demand.

The keyvals are appended after MPI_FT so that the existing predefined
values stay put, with matching entries in mpif-values.py to keep the C
and Fortran numbering identical.  The predefined-keyval bitmap is
already bounded by MPI_ATTR_PREDEFINED_KEY_MAX and needed no change.

Table 12.1 types VALUE_UB as MPI_Count *, and the attribute machinery
has no MPI_Count slot -- every other predefined attribute is integer- or
address-valued.  It is stored as an MPI_Aint, which is the same width
wherever Open MPI runs now that 32-bit environments are unsupported;
the reasoning is recorded at the call site so the choice does not later
read as a type error.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Covers counter management, all eight notified operations in their
blocking and request-based forms, notification index errors, growth past
the reserved capacity, the mpi_assert_max_num_notify bound, and the
three notification window attributes.

A second test forces osc/rdma and checks that every notified entry point
reports MPI_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION without moving any data, and that
the attributes read zero.  That is the contract which lets components
that do not implement the chapter remain untouched, so it is worth
testing directly rather than assuming.

Both are single-process tests wired into make check, so the shared
segment growth path is exercised only in its single-rank form, where the
counters are a plain heap allocation.  The collective path -- segment
creation, broadcast, attach, the status allreduce and the barrier before
unlink -- needs a multi-rank test that this harness cannot host.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
The notified communication code carried long block comments that
restated the standard at length and recorded design deliberation.
Reduce them to short notes that say what the code does and cite the
relevant MPI-5.1 section, so the comment density matches the
surrounding osc/sm sources.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
@joe-explr joe-explr changed the title Notified rma sm OSC-SM: Notified RMA Implementation with Set notify and Bounds Aug 12, 2026
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2026 Joseph Antony. All rights reserved.
* $COPYRIGHT$

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will remove this , not sure what to fill here

@joe-explr joe-explr closed this Aug 12, 2026
@joe-explr joe-explr reopened this Aug 12, 2026
MPI_WIN_GET_NUM_NOTIFY takes target_rank as a nonnegative integer in the
group of the window, but the frontend did not validate it.  The osc/sm and
osc/ucx backends both range-check it and return MPI_ERR_RANK, so this was
not a crash, but argument validation belongs in the frontend under
MPI_PARAM_CHECK, consistent with the notified communication operations and
with MPI_Win_shared_query.

MPI_PROC_NULL is deliberately not accepted here: unlike the notified
communication operations, the spec specifies target_rank as nonnegative.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Antony <jajoseph.antony18@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@joe-explr joe-explr closed this Aug 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants