#2219: Add UnpackCommandlet for extracting already supported archieve Formats

[majesteSil]

This PR fixes #2219

Adds a new "unpack" commandlet that extracts archive files into a target directory. The commandlet supports ZIP, TAR, TAR.GZ, TAR.BZ2, 7Z, JAR (cross-platform) and notes platform-specific formats like MSI/DMG/PKG. The commandlet is registered in the commandlet manager and covered by unit tests.

Implemented changes:

• Modified: CommandletManagerImpl (registers new commandlet)
• Added: UnpackCommandlet (new commandlet implementation)
• Added: UnpackCommandletTest (unit tests)

---

Testing instructions

Please add conscise, understandable instructions on how a reviewer can test/verify the functionality of your contribution here:

• to test the Commandlet first check the branch/ and set your local env with the build-local-dev.sh script, so you have all the latest changes
• then go ahead make sure you have an archieve of the supported type with the right Operating System (tar on Linux ...) somes tests archieve are available in the test/ressources directory under executable_and_non_executable.$archive_format
• then try ide unpack $archive (this will unpaack your archive in the current working DIrectory)
• then try ide unpack $archie target $targetDir (this will unpack your archive to the specified target directory)

---

Checklist for this PR

Make sure everything is checked before merging this PR. For further info please also see
our DoD.

• When running mvn clean test locally all tests pass and build is successful
• PR title is of the form #«issue-id»: «brief summary» (e.g. #921: fixed setup.bat and not feature/921 fixed setup.bat). If no issue ID exists, title only.
• PR top-level comment summaries what has been done and contains link to addressed issue(s)
• PR and issue(s) have suitable labels
• Issue is set to In Progress and assigned to you or there is no issue (might happen for very small PRs)
• You followed all coding conventions
• You have added the issue implemented by your PR in CHANGELOG.adoc unless issue is labelled
  with internal
• You have not changed any dependency in pom.xml files or otherwise if runtime dependencies changed, you have updated our LICENSE.asciidoc
• You have formulated clear instructions on how to test your contribution under "Testing instructions"

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[coveralls]

Coverage Report for CI Build 32852977586

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 73.665%

Details

• Coverage increased (+0.1%) from the base build.
• Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
• 8 coverage regressions across 2 files.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

8 previously-covered lines in 2 files lost coverage.

File	Lines Losing Coverage	Coverage
com/devonfw/tools/ide/commandlet/CommandletManagerImpl.java	7	92.09%
com/devonfw/tools/ide/version/VersionSegment.java	1	91.86%

---

Coverage Stats

Relevant Lines:	18194
Covered Lines:	14008
Line Coverage:	76.99%
Relevant Branches:	8068
Covered Branches:	5338
Branch Coverage:	66.16%
Branches in Coverage %:	Yes
Coverage Strength:	3.29 hits per line

---

💛 - Coveralls

[samuelkos17]

Great work on adding an unpack commandlet to IDEasy! I've tested the unpacking and it works, however the target parameter is not working. So I still have a few suggestions, mainly concerning the target parameter not working and wrong descriptions.
Also your commits have an inconsistent link to the issue (some falsely point to #2298). This should be fixed aswell.

[samuelkos17]

Thanks for adding the E2E test for CLI parsing, it looks good to me! I still have a few minor style suggestions, when they're addressed this can be moved to In Review 😄

[hohwille]

@majesteSil thank you for your PR. Great that you completed your own commandlet successfully and covered it with a solid test. Also DoD was completed with CHANGELOG, etc.
Great job 👍
I left two small comments for improvement that should be addressed easy and quickly. Then we can merge.

[hohwille]

Isn't the unpack routine in FileAccess first extracting to a temporary directory that is technically $IDE_ROOT/tmp?
If I am not mistaken then we should remove this:

Suggested change

	@Override
	public boolean isIdeRootRequired() {
	return false;
	}

[hohwille]

Should be a FileProperty instead of a PathProperty. Specifying a folder as archive does not seem to make sense.