Added labels for addresses

[CharliePlett]

Added labels for address nodes and building_addresses and appended address to building names. OpenHistoricalMap/issues#1353

[1ec5]

If the building has a house number but lacks a name, this newline shifts the house number down by a full line. The user would perceive a label at a different location, possibly on a different building.

[CharliePlett]

Yeah, I was kind of thinking the same. Would you suggest keeping the number the same size as the name? Because I also feel like the label gets very tall when it's a longer name and wraps on 2 lines and then also the address on a third line. And then your translation text in the future.

[CharliePlett]

Oh, I just realized what you actually commented. Yeah, I can fix that.

[1ec5]

Yeah, I was kind of thinking the same. Would you suggest keeping the number the same size as the name? Because I also feel like the label gets very tall when it's a longer name and wraps on 2 lines and then also the address on a third line.

I think the subtitle text in #73 (comment) is less confusing than OpenHistoricalMap/issues#1353 (comment), particularly because a four-digit number in parentheses could easily be mistaken for a year.

If the house number makes the label too tall, I suppose we could nix the house number when there’s already a name. OSM Carto does that under the assumption that a named building is already sufficiently identifiable. Alternatively, we could shrink the building labels to match the POI labels. If so, I’d shrink the house numbers further still or italicize them to keep them distinct from the building names.

And then your translation text in the future.

The translation replaces the main text. The gloss we’re considering in OpenHistoricalMap/issues#799 would get appended to labels in some layers, particularly places, but not necessarily for something like buildings, since it could get pretty repetitive.