Skip to content

Document schema change monitors for Data Observability - #39122

Open
kevinzenghu wants to merge 10 commits into
masterfrom
kevin.hu/schema-change-monitors
Open

Document schema change monitors for Data Observability#39122
kevinzenghu wants to merge 10 commits into
masterfrom
kevin.hu/schema-change-monitors

Conversation

@kevinzenghu

@kevinzenghu kevinzenghu commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Documents schema change monitors, which were not covered anywhere in monitors/types/, and corrects several details on the Data Observability monitor page.

Changes:

  1. Monitor types table in the Overview. The page is titled "Data Observability Monitor" but described only the data quality type, while the creation flow offers four: Data Quality, Job, Schema Change, and Source to Target. The table names all four and links to the sections that document them.
  2. New Schema change monitors section: the four change types (added, removed, renamed, type changed) across databases, schemas, tables, and columns; creation steps; supported warehouses; and the Schema Changes view for browsing detections without creating a monitor.
  3. Monitor schedule rewritten. It documented only Hourly, Daily, and Manual. The flow offers a Scheduled and Manual toggle, with Hourly, Every 3 hours, Every 6 hours, Every 12 hours, Daily, and Custom schedule beneath it. Custom schedules take a cron expression and can run as often as every 15 minutes, with a preview of upcoming run times.
  4. New Model configuration section covering the settings available to anomaly monitors, and the behavior when data is missing for an evaluation.
  5. Detection method labels updated from Anomaly/Threshold to Anomalies/Thresholds to match the UI.

Merge readiness

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

  • ⚠️ Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). If you've already created your PR with an incorrect branch name, please rename your branch and open a fresh PR.
  • 🤖 New: Comment with /review to run an automated check that catches common issues before a Documentation team member reviews your PR.

AI assistance

Drafted with Claude Code from the existing page structure, the monitor creation flow, the schedule and model configuration controls, and the Schema Changes view.

One thing worth a check: supported warehouses for schema change detection are listed as Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, and Redshift.

Additional notes

Schema change monitors are in Preview but do not require requesting access, so the Preview note states the phase without pointing to support, matching the pattern used on the AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory pages.

One follow-up this PR does not attempt: Job monitors are named in the new table but are not documented anywhere, and likely deserve their own section or page.

A screenshot of the monitor type selector would suit the new Overview table, and one of the Schema Changes view would suit that section.

Adds a Source-to-Target monitors section to the Data Observability
monitor page, covering creation steps, comparison types, custom SQL
usage, and evaluation behavior. Also adds an example monitor and a
pointer from the overview.
Uses the labels shown in the creation flow: the monitor type is
Source to Target, source and target are chosen in separate steps, and
the comparison control is Format. Also notes the Preview Monitor
Evaluation panel.
The Format options are already described in the creation steps.
- Sentence-case the section headings, matching the rest of the page
- Use "% Difference" instead of "Percent Difference"
- Number the creation steps explicitly instead of repeating "1."
- Add concrete use cases: replication, reconciliation, migration cutover,
  and transformation checks
- Name the supported metric types
- State region availability
- Explain that the difference is recorded as its own metric, so the
  standard detection methods apply
- Difference is the target value minus the source value, not an
  absolute value, so note that a negative result means the target
  has less than the source
- Note that % Difference is relative to the source value
- Remove the evaluation-skip conditions
- Add a monitor types table to the overview, since the page previously
  described only the data quality type while the creation flow offers
  four
- Add a schema change monitors section covering change types, creation
  steps, supported warehouses, and the schema changes view
- Match the detection method labels to the UI (Anomalies, Thresholds)
Source to target monitors landed on master. All conflicts were the
same shape: this branch already contained that content plus the schema
change additions, so the branch version was kept throughout.
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@jhgilbert jhgilbert added the astro-reorg-no-conflicts Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg label Aug 11, 2026
…ule options

- Schema change monitors do not require requesting access, so the
  Preview note no longer points to support
- Link the schema change creation flow and the Schema Changes view
- Document the full monitor schedule options, including custom cron
  schedules down to every 15 minutes and the run-time preview
- Add a model configuration section for anomaly monitors
@kevinzenghu
kevinzenghu marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2026 20:41
@kevinzenghu
kevinzenghu requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2026 20:41
@evazorro evazorro self-assigned this Aug 11, 2026
@evazorro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Created DOCS-15392 for Docs team review

@evazorro evazorro added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Aug 11, 2026
@evazorro evazorro removed their assignment Aug 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

astro-reorg-no-conflicts Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants