Skip to content

docs(adr): cite RFC 9293 for direct TCP peer binding - #225

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/cite-rfc-9293-direct-tcp-6111
Draft

docs(adr): cite RFC 9293 for direct TCP peer binding#225
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/cite-rfc-9293-direct-tcp-6111

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Draft only. Do not merge. Do not mark Ready.

Branched from current main, not stacked on #224 or other open PRs. Docs only. Touches only docs/adr/0005-direct-socket-binding.md to avoid conflicting with #224.

Accepted ADR 0005 already names RFC 9293 in the Standards paragraph (TCP connection identified by a pair of endpoint sockets; TcpStream::connect_timeout / peer_addr as the direct transport proof) but had no APA 7th References with DOI/URL. This change keeps the existing decision, Accepted status, and Standards prose unchanged and adds locators for RFC 9293 only.

Leave the PR as GitHub Draft.

Locator (live-checked 2026-08-25)

Source Locator Live-check
Eddy, W. (Ed.). (2022). Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) (RFC 9293). RFC Editor. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9293 · https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293 Crossref MATCH (editor W. Eddy; 2022-08). rfc-editor JSON authors ["W. Eddy, Ed."], August 2022, HTTP 200.

Scope

Not cited

Drafts, unmerged PRs, cancelled OpenCode/Strix scans, RFC 793 as current (9293 is the current Standards Track TCP spec), rustls/rustc docs as standards, invented papers, DNS-rebinding papers, TLS/HTTP/proxy/Chromium claims.

Verification

Docs-only markdown citation. File-level diff is confined to docs/adr/0005-direct-socket-binding.md.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Add an APA 7th References section to accepted ADR 0005 with DOI and RFC Editor locators for RFC 9293 only. Leave the existing decision, Accepted status, and Standards prose unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Seongho Bae <seonghobae@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants