docs: refresh live product and technical gap baseline - #1252
Conversation
- Rebind baseline to current protected main HEAD. - Capture 30 open .github PRs with exact head SHAs and merge metadata. - Add ADR-0002 and regression test for baseline contract. Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Original prompt from Automation
|
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository. ⚙️ Control Options:
|
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
devin-ai-integration
Bot
added
the
merge: urgent-review
Steward receipt — independent review required
Org ruleset @opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review |
Refresh the product/technical gap snapshot against the current open queue, keep SHA rows as operational metadata, and record Figma File ID N/A plus APA 7th doctoring so hourly loops re-collect reviews and Checks.
Keep the gap inventory honest after the refresh push and point CLAUDE.md at the snapshot so hourly loops re-read exact heads before merge.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for This refresh binds the live 108-PR snapshot including #1257, removes the trailing whitespace that failed |
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for Live inventory is now 104 open PRs (G-01/G-04), #1253-#1256 closed unmerged with #1213 as the Strix successor (G-03), and ContextualWisdomLab/naruon#975 is Done (G-06). The SHA table is a snapshot, not merge authorization. Unresolved |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
… missing The inventory contract now asserts the declared-count regex matched before calling group(1), so a reworded header raises AssertionError instead of AttributeError.
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for Follow-up to the 104-row inventory: the PR-count header regex now fail-closes with a readable assertion. Threads from the prior head are resolved. The SHA table is a snapshot, not merge authorization. |
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for Live inventory is 108 open PRs including #1258-#1261. Prior CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT threads are resolved. The table is not merge authorization. |
Record the main-line Strix LiteLLM openai-direct rewrite as G-03 successor, keep CLEAN as snapshot metadata rather than merge authorization, and refresh exact 40-character heads after concurrent remote commits.
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for Live inventory now includes #1262 (G-03 main-line LiteLLM openai-direct rewrite). GitHub CLEAN on the previous head is not merge authorization. Independent current-head approval is required. |
|
Independent current-head review request for exact HEAD Gap G-03: required Strix still fail-closes 0-vuln complete scans on |
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for Live inventory is 103 open PRs after #1260/#1261 closed unmerged. G-03 successor remains #1263. The SHA table is a snapshot, not merge authorization. |
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for Previous head |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review current-head review for Live inventory is 97 open PRs including #1267/#1269. Independent current-head OpenCode APPROVE is required; the SHA table is not merge authorization. |
OpenCode Review Overview
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (4 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs (4 files)"]
R2 --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test: test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test: test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Inspected changed files including docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md, tests/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and docs/CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT.md hunks. Approval sufficiency: trusted Coverage execution evidence PASS supports the documented snapshot contracts. Verification posture: repository-native python3 -m pytest tests executed by the trusted workflow at head 2952148. Linter/static: no lint surface changed; hadolint/packaging surfaces untouched. TDD/regression: four new regression tests pin markers, SHA-bound row completeness, the ADR Figma N/A boundary, and section-10 pointers. Coverage: Coverage execution evidence shows Result: PASS, supported repository test suites passed (python3 -m pytest tests). Docstring coverage: Coverage execution evidence shows configured repository docstring gates passed or advisory. DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed base-to-head flowchart maps entry-point pointers to the new snapshot and the new test assertions to the passing pytest verification. PoC/execution: trusted Coverage Decision PASS receipt; no browser/runtime-tool claims made. DDD/domain: control-plane documentation domain, consistent with sibling doctoring documents. CDD/context: snapshot isolated in docs/ with explicit not-merge-authorization framing preserved. Similar issues: matches the established refresh pattern (docs: bind live 107-PR/104-PR inventories) in per-file history. Claim/concept check: PR-body claims (30-row SHA-bound inventory, delta section, ADR Figma N/A, APA 7th doctoring) are each enforced by test assertions verified at head. Standards search: no external standards claim requires adjudication; APA 7th references confined to doctoring format. Compatibility/convention: naming review found no reserved-word or single-word identifiers; new file names follow docs/adr, docs/doctoring, and tests/ conventions; no API/schema/config names changed. Breaking-change/backcompat: none — additive docs plus additive tests. Performance: no runtime code changed. Developer experience: DX surface is agent-bootstrap documentation; pointers reduce stale-inventory ambiguity and match existing entry-point patterns. User experience: UX surface is reviewer/operator-facing docs rendering on GitHub; tables and headers unchanged in shape. Visual/DOM: non-web interaction surface reviewed (markdown docs and pytest output), no web UI changed. Accessibility/i18n: Korean/English mixed docs retained as-is; no UI text changed. Supply-chain/license: no dependencies added or upgraded. Packaging: unpackaged_source_surfaces empty; pyproject.toml test/docstring/security commands remain the contract. Security/privacy: snapshot exposes only public PR numbers, head SHAs, and GitHub merge states; tests assert merge authorization language is absent from rows. Implementation completeness: no placeholder bodies; all four tests are executable. Residual evidence limits: Failed-check collector timed out (no active failed checks listed) and PR review/comment lists could not be collected; current-head sections report no unresolved threads.
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including AGENTS.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, CHANGELOG.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT.md, and 4 more.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports supported repository test suites passed.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports configured repository docstring gates passed or docstring coverage was advisory.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects AGENTS.md to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source claims require trusted bounded source evidence prepared outside the isolated model process; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: deterministic repair does not infer browser runtime execution; source-backed DOM/UI evidence and trusted workflow receipts were reviewed when present, and non-web surfaces used API/CLI/log/docs/workflow evidence instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
Adversarial validation
{"status":"passed","probes":[{"path":"tests/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py","line":91,"hypothesis":"The section-10 rebinding of docs/CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT.md dropped the live-baseline pointer, naruon#974/#975 references, Done status, or the merge-authorization disclaimer, silently regressing agent navigation.","attack_or_counterexample":"Scan current-head docs/CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT.md for each pinned narrative marker (product-technical-gap-baseline.md, Figma File ID, N/A, ContextualWisdomLab/naruon#974, #975, Done, merge authorization) using the shipped regression test.","evidence":"Trusted source trace at tests/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py:91: CodeGraph verbatim current-head source lines 79-91 assert all seven markers in docs/CWL-MASTER-CONTEXT.md, and trusted Coverage execution evidence records Result: PASS with supported repository test suites passed (python3 -m pytest tests), so every assertion held at this head; Trusted current-head source binding at tests/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py:91; source-line-sha256=b0d0ac5dae33f9130bedec44b0e99bc37aa6915a4505877626374e0bc530bdd5","outcome":"falsified"},{"path":"AGENTS.md","line":4,"hypothesis":"The new AGENTS.md entry-point sentence links to nonexistent files or misstates the Figma boundary, breaking agent bootstrap on this repo.","attack_or_counterexample":"Resolve both newly linked targets (docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md, docs/adr/0002-product-technical-gap-baseline.md) against the current-head Changed files list and against the ADR boundary assertions.","evidence":"Trusted source trace at AGENTS.md:4: focused changed hunks show the entry sentence linking both targets; the Changed files section marks both as A (added at this head), CodeGraph verbatim source of tests/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py lines 68-76 asserts 'Figma File ID: N/A' and 'Storybook' in the ADR, and trusted Coverage execution evidence records Result: PASS for the suite at this head; Trusted current-head source binding at AGENTS.md:4; source-line-sha256=20e3a4d380ad1b2fa201ea0b3a27e3393ca454d5e17ee34ea0b1ad3c3b075ff9","outcome":"falsified"}],"residual_risk":"The failed-check collector timed out, so the approval gate re-queries current-head GitHub Checks before merge; the frozen open-PR count decays as the live queue moves and requires the next routine snapshot refresh."}- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Docs-plus-test rebinding of the live gap baseline is internally consistent, preserves the not-merge-authorization trust boundary, and is verified by trusted passing repository test suites at this head.
- Head SHA:
295214894284330d5837ee92fadfdce18049e6f3 - Workflow run: 32656752464
- Workflow attempt: 1
* docs: refresh gap baseline after #1252 merged to main Bind the live 95-PR inventory to protected main 9f8f840. The SHA table is a snapshot, not merge authorization. * docs: align G-02 with BEHIND inventory and bind 99 live PRs Record GitHub CLEAN #1265 as snapshot metadata, not merge authorization, and keep #1162/#1227/#1215 as BEHIND after #1252. * docs: bind live 98-PR inventory while #1265 waits for OpenCode Keep GitHub CLEAN #1265 as snapshot metadata, not merge authorization, and record that required Strix CRs remain G-03. * docs: correct live PR 1263 head evidence
1 participant
Summary
Rebinds the central product and technical gap baseline to the current protected
mainHEAD and the live.githubPR inventory.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdwith CWL Master Context, naruon fix(review): list applyable suggestion ranges in overview receipts #974, GitHub Project Add Palette journal for profile repo #1, PRD/TRD/UML bounds, gap registerG-01..G-14, and 30 open PR rows bound to exact head SHAs and merge metadata.docs/adr/0002-product-technical-gap-baseline.mdstating the control-plane scope andFigma File ID: N/Aboundary.tests/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.pyto regression-check governance markers, SHA-bound inventory completeness, and the UI ADR boundary.This supersedes the stale, conflicted
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline-20260820PR (#1163), which had a merge conflict and a failedqualitycheck from an outdated snapshot.No source code changes; the new regression test passes locally with
python -m pytest tests/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py -q.Link to Devin session: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/545e042630f94159a4a57f2ca36accce