Summary
While smoke testing the package updates on the 8-24-26-packages branch, two separate 502-producing
defects turned up. Neither is caused by the dependency bumps — both reproduce on main as well. They
are filed together because both were found the same way, but they are independent problems.
The first one is the more serious of the two: every route mishandles application/ld+json, and
/create leaks a raw TypeError to the client as a 500.
Finding 1: application/ld+json passes the content-type gate but is never parsed
rest.js accepts application/ld+json as a valid request content type
(rest.js#L1-L4), so verifyJsonContentType lets the request through
instead of returning 415. But app.js only mounts express.json()
(app.js#L20), whose body-parser type option defaults to
application/json and does not match the +json structured suffix. express.text() on the next
line only claims text/plain.
The result is that no parser claims the body, so req.body is undefined (Express 5 no longer
defaults it to {}), and every route then misbehaves in its own way.
Reproduction
Every request below sends a well-formed JSON body with a valid @id, and differs from a working
request only in the Content-Type header:
curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/ld+json' \
--data '{"@id":"https://devstore.rerum.io/v1/id/000000000000000000000000","type":"Probe"}' \
http://localhost:3002/create
Observed behavior
| Route |
Status |
Response body |
POST /query |
502 |
400: .../query?limit=10&skip=0 - Detected empty JSON object. |
POST /create |
500 |
Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id') |
PUT /update |
400 |
No record id to update! |
PUT /overwrite |
400 |
No record id to overwrite! |
DELETE /delete |
400 |
No record id to delete! |
The identical body sent as application/json returns 200/201 as expected.
Why each is wrong
/create returns 500 and leaks an internal error. req.body.id on
routes/create.js#L12 throws a TypeError against undefined. The route's
catch has no err.status, so it falls through to 500 and sends the raw V8 message
(Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id')) to the client. That is an internal
implementation detail on the wire, and it contradicts our own guidance about returning generic
error messages rather than internal details.
/query returns 502. JSON.stringify(undefined) is undefined, not '{}', so the empty-query
guard on routes/query.js#L16 is bypassed. The request is forwarded upstream
with no body, RERUM 400s, and TinyNode maps that to 502 — reporting an upstream failure for what is
really a client error we should have caught.
/update, /overwrite, /delete return a misleading 400. The status code is defensible, but
the message tells the caller they omitted a record id when they plainly supplied one. That will send
people debugging the wrong thing.
Suggested fix
Either accept ld+json properly or reject it, but stop doing both. Accepting it is the smaller change
and matches what rest.js already advertises:
app.use(express.json({ type: ["application/json", "application/ld+json"] }))
Given this is a JSON-LD store, accepting it seems clearly correct. Worth deciding separately whether
/create should also guard req.body defensively so a missing body can never produce a raw
TypeError again — the same class of bug would resurface for any future unparsed content type.
This is a gap left by #110, which introduced rest.js and the ld+json allowance without a matching
parser change.
Finding 2: bodied DELETE /delete returns 502 because the upstream endpoint does not exist
The legacy bodied-delete handler (routes/delete.js#L27) posts to
${RERUM_API_ADDR}delete. That endpoint does not exist on devstore — it 404s, and TinyNode maps the
404 to a 502.
Reproduction
# create something to delete, then:
curl -X DELETE -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"@id":"https://devstore.rerum.io/v1/id/<id>"}' \
http://localhost:3002/delete
# -> HTTP 502
# 404: https://devstore.rerum.io/v1/api/delete - This page does not exist
Confirmed against RERUM directly, so this is upstream and not a TinyNode routing mistake:
curl -i -X DELETE -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"@id":"..."}' https://devstore.rerum.io/v1/api/delete
# -> HTTP 404
The path form works correctly:
curl -X DELETE http://localhost:3002/delete/<id>
# -> HTTP 204
What to decide
This route cannot succeed against devstore in its current form, so one of the following is needed:
- Confirm whether
/v1/api/delete with a body is supposed to exist on RERUM. If it is, this is a
RERUM bug and TinyNode is fine.
- If it is not coming back, have the bodied handler extract the id from
@id and delegate to the
path form, so the documented legacy call keeps working.
- Failing both, deprecate the bodied form and return a 400 that says so, rather than a 502 that
implies an upstream outage.
Related to #89, which covers different odd behavior on the same endpoint (a delete with no id
returning 204). That specific case now correctly returns 400, so #89 may be partly stale.
Environment
- Branch
8-24-26-packages, also reproduces on main
- Node v24.19.0, npm 12.0.2
RERUM_API_ADDR=https://devstore.rerum.io/v1/api/
- All 80 route tests and 5 e2e tests pass, so neither defect is currently covered by a test
Summary
While smoke testing the package updates on the
8-24-26-packagesbranch, two separate 502-producingdefects turned up. Neither is caused by the dependency bumps — both reproduce on
mainas well. Theyare filed together because both were found the same way, but they are independent problems.
The first one is the more serious of the two: every route mishandles
application/ld+json, and/createleaks a rawTypeErrorto the client as a 500.Finding 1:
application/ld+jsonpasses the content-type gate but is never parsedrest.jsacceptsapplication/ld+jsonas a valid request content type(rest.js#L1-L4), so
verifyJsonContentTypelets the request throughinstead of returning 415. But
app.jsonly mountsexpress.json()(app.js#L20), whose body-parser
typeoption defaults toapplication/jsonand does not match the+jsonstructured suffix.express.text()on the nextline only claims
text/plain.The result is that no parser claims the body, so
req.bodyisundefined(Express 5 no longerdefaults it to
{}), and every route then misbehaves in its own way.Reproduction
Every request below sends a well-formed JSON body with a valid
@id, and differs from a workingrequest only in the
Content-Typeheader:Observed behavior
POST /query400: .../query?limit=10&skip=0 - Detected empty JSON object.POST /createCannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id')PUT /updateNo record id to update!PUT /overwriteNo record id to overwrite!DELETE /deleteNo record id to delete!The identical body sent as
application/jsonreturns 200/201 as expected.Why each is wrong
/createreturns 500 and leaks an internal error.req.body.idonroutes/create.js#L12 throws a
TypeErroragainstundefined. The route'scatchhas noerr.status, so it falls through to 500 and sends the raw V8 message(
Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id')) to the client. That is an internalimplementation detail on the wire, and it contradicts our own guidance about returning generic
error messages rather than internal details.
/queryreturns 502.JSON.stringify(undefined)isundefined, not'{}', so the empty-queryguard on routes/query.js#L16 is bypassed. The request is forwarded upstream
with no body, RERUM 400s, and TinyNode maps that to 502 — reporting an upstream failure for what is
really a client error we should have caught.
/update,/overwrite,/deletereturn a misleading 400. The status code is defensible, butthe message tells the caller they omitted a record id when they plainly supplied one. That will send
people debugging the wrong thing.
Suggested fix
Either accept ld+json properly or reject it, but stop doing both. Accepting it is the smaller change
and matches what
rest.jsalready advertises:Given this is a JSON-LD store, accepting it seems clearly correct. Worth deciding separately whether
/createshould also guardreq.bodydefensively so a missing body can never produce a rawTypeErroragain — the same class of bug would resurface for any future unparsed content type.This is a gap left by #110, which introduced
rest.jsand the ld+json allowance without a matchingparser change.
Finding 2: bodied
DELETE /deletereturns 502 because the upstream endpoint does not existThe legacy bodied-delete handler (routes/delete.js#L27) posts to
${RERUM_API_ADDR}delete. That endpoint does not exist on devstore — it 404s, and TinyNode maps the404 to a 502.
Reproduction
Confirmed against RERUM directly, so this is upstream and not a TinyNode routing mistake:
The path form works correctly:
What to decide
This route cannot succeed against devstore in its current form, so one of the following is needed:
/v1/api/deletewith a body is supposed to exist on RERUM. If it is, this is aRERUM bug and TinyNode is fine.
@idand delegate to thepath form, so the documented legacy call keeps working.
implies an upstream outage.
Related to #89, which covers different odd behavior on the same endpoint (a delete with no id
returning 204). That specific case now correctly returns 400, so #89 may be partly stale.
Environment
8-24-26-packages, also reproduces onmainRERUM_API_ADDR=https://devstore.rerum.io/v1/api/